Report of the Board of 6ème A
of December 4, 2009 under the chairmanship of Ms Cheang METTE KIM, Deputy Principal of the college professors
present: Mr BERTHON (Technology and teacher) Mr SALOME (French ), Mrs Keradennec (Mathematics), Mr ARRIBARD (English), Mr BELKAID (History and Geography), Mrs. HEMON (SVT), Ms. AUBOURG (Physical Education) students
Delegates: Julie and Laetitia Guyon WATCH
Parent delegate: Mrs. LEBOUC
balance on the head teacher of the class atmosphere and Ratings of different teachers on the class: Class
enjoyable throughout with satisfactory results, despite a group of boys to be disruptive.
class of 21 students (22 at the beginning of the year) Overall average
Class: 13.35
2 students have an average below 10. Many teachers complain
duties not homemade
During this council, 10 students received the congratulations, encouragement 5, 3 and 2 warnings work behavior have been given. Notes
pupil delegates and answers:
remark on the class: the class of 6èmeA climate is pleasant, but there are students who disrupt the course.
general remarks:
1 - non-compliance by large (in the canteen, lockers front)
2 - in the canteen, the problem of spitting on the trays and pitchers of water
3 - forced open some lockers by students with a password
Mette Kim Cheang took note of these points.
4 - bridge near the CDI: the possibility of crossing the bridge is given temporarily during the work.
5 - UNSS lunch and resumed during the afternoon, students are forced to hurry to avoid being late. Teachers and Mette KIM Cheang are aware, but they find that there is actually little backward. Notes
delegates from parents and answers:
- workload during the school holidays of All Saints: Salome Mr recalled that the duties required consistent time working week of his absence as an accompanist of the trip Italy, week prior to school holidays.
report made by Ms. LEBOUC
Minutes of Meeting 6th E CLASS COUNCIL of 03/12/2009
PERSONS PRESENT:
Deputy Head of School: Ms. Mette-KIM Cheang
Teachers: Mrs. AUBOURG (EPS), Mr. BELKAID (History Geography ), Mr BERTHON (Technology), Mr. BOUHRA (Mathematics), M. SALOME (French)
Students Deputies Class: Miss Mary Sammartano, Miss Celestine VERDUN
Parent Representative: Mrs. Lévrard
REVIEW OF TEACHER, M. SALOME on the atmosphere of the class and work. Overall average
Class: 12.99 / 20 (note life outside of class); Pretty good result masking disparities: 13 to 16 students have a fairly good or good overall average. 4 students are not average, 1 student did not average in seven subjects. In music and technology (materials without pre-requisite primary school), many students did not mean: learning problem.
Behavior: Three students disrupt classes. Reprimands may point the channel.
Individual work in class: do not worry; Lab group: very noisy
OPINION OF THE VARIOUS TEACHERS on class. Ms.
AUBOURG: class tonic and very dynamic. Boys agitated; serious girls but creating a lot of stories ...
Mr. BELKAID: dynamic class, although participating in oral and masts. But often poorly tuned and very noisy. Mr.
BERTHON: students curious, active and respectful. Nice atmosphere. Pleased to move forward.
Nevertheless, some disruptive students in the class. Another downside: if class work is very satisfying work done at home is enough (bad test scores). Mr.
BOUHRA: Class satisfactory overall. No problem of discipline. Students lend themselves to the game of questions and answers but botched the lessons to learn. Control knowledge unsatisfactory. Lack of homework, lack of attention and investment. Review the tables for a few ...
Mrs. CLEMENT ROMAN (opinion given to Mr. SALOME): Class pleasant, satisfactory participation, but the sixth slower than others.
M. SALOME: Good overall average in French but 5 students were dropping out already. Large gaps in spelling: no replay or method; unaware of grammatical rules compliance and spelling.
ALL PROFESSORS and Mette recall that all subjects are important. The coefficient is the same for all the Brevet. Everything counts. No material should be studied as a dilettante. NOTES
pupil delegates and responses.
- especially disruptive students in English classes. "Fed" for children who want to move and listen to teachers. Response
Mr. and Mrs. SALOME METTE: "it is for delegates to speak to the class and to join forces in solidarity against the disruptive elements" to think Mr. SALOME establish a tracking sheet for each specific difficult student.
- Collective punishments unjust (case history geo): Mr. BELKAID recalls that the rules of punishment had been clearly articulated and validated by the whole class in the fall. He stressed that these last two Mondays all children (not just the "usual suspects") were particularly noisy and not very attentive. This issue of punishment to be revisited in the classroom.
- How to "learn" lessons of history / geography? Mr. BELKAID stands available to students.
the DELEGATE NOTES PARENTS AND ANSWERS.
- Lack of accurate information for weeks by SALOME and BM can not do better. The calendar year has been painted different colors depending on whether the week A or B. This schedule is exclusively ATP.
- Matching Parent / teacher non-reciprocal. Returns unsigned words. Words read? Teachers surprised. Students show they the words of parents to teachers?
- Move over Sports: Ms. AUBOURG confirms that two times two hours of sport in the morning the first hour is not ideal. Mette says it is not easy to satisfy everyone in the schedules.
- Unruly Children in English: Read answers under "disruptive students."
- The Permanence is not a place of study: Mette replied that the management of permanence is not simple. It was actually not a place to learn but you can do written work.
- CDI 12h to 14h: Students can they go free? : Mette replied that access can not be free: a rotation is necessary because 23 classes share this place. Groups are limited to 15 students on average.
- Penalties individual rather than collective See paragraph above "collective punishment".
- Lots of homework the night before for the next day (math, English, French): Mr. SALOME indicates that for its part, the long work are given in advance. Only short exercises are given the day before for the morrow. Mette think it is mainly a problem of organization and method of student work.
- Lightening the weight of the binder? Students should not hesitate to ask the teachers what book to bring the next course. It seems that too heavy schoolbag is also related to the fear of forgetting its manual: By default students seriously worried and carry all their books.
Report prepared by Isabelle Levrard.
Report of the Board class 6F, 7 December 2009 under the chairmanship of Mr Brault
Teachers attendance: Mr Ouchikhine Ms. Cocq, Ms. Roman-Clement,
Other persons: Mr. Brault
Deputies Students: Dylan Jousse, Elise
parents Delegate: Mr Génevaux
balance on the head teacher of the class room and work: class
whose results are correct. It is a class alive. It works well because students are likely to work even if for some it requires great efforts. Progress was made since the beginning of the school year.
Two students disrupt the proper functioning of the class. This creates a tension in it. Some acts of physical violence are
to regret. Students have so far not afraid to go to class.
The unit should be improved by the class of snow. Currently 12 of the 15 students expected to participate. A new student arrived late.
organization using folders is An additional difficulty of organization.
For those who have the most organizational problems, aid can be offered in the form of tutoring by another student who will help him tidy up his cabinet to take over his homework. If this method is inadequate for some students, the use of notebooks will be replaced. The parent may also their child on their side, making sure the bags are complete before returning to college, that all equipment is present: without his classes, it is difficult to learn its lessons. Notes
pupil delegates: Nothing to report more. Notes
delegates from parents and answers: For delegates that both parents can come to class council, a consultation between Mr. Brault and parents will be made in advance, to take account of the freedom of schedule to parents to fix the next date. For parents
delegates: JM Génevaux
Proceedings of the class council 4D 26.11.2009 under the Chairmanship of Ms Mette King Cheang assistant headteacher.
Teachers present: Ms. D'Orfond-Guéranger (English)-Ferari Dutay (French) Pinçon (English) Lanceleur (Physics) Stadnicki (Arts plastics) Mr. Shahid (Maths) Garcia (Hist-Geo) Launais (EPS) (Physics) students
Deputies: Paola Brault and Eva-Noor Heck
Deputies parents: Lawrence Coia
* Assessment of the teacher on the class C
is a class with a good spirit, a strong intellectual and human potential. Students are young, distracted and very talkative, but they are aware of this state. Lack of work is noted by all teachers. * Reviews
different teachers:
- Techno M. Guillois: Average, nice atmosphere but talkative.
- EPS Mr Launais: Level homogeneous but small, improvements at quarter end
- Physics Ms. Lanceleur: Class pleasant but a lack of involvement and work.
- M.: medium low and not learning the lessons
- Math Mr. Shahid: Results correct but talkative and little work.
- English Ms. Pinçon: dynamic class and talkative students, work at home is superficial
- Ms. French-Ferari Dutay: An average low below 10 despite many small control over 5, students and talkative players. The work is not regular and lessons not learned.
- Hist Geo-Garcia: A good potential and dynamism with a capacity for work and reflection, but provides little effort and a lack of progress. Underachieving students need a class header.
- English Ms. D'Orfond-Guéranger: Good oral problems but to learn.
- Life Class: A very good spirit in the classroom. * Questions
students: Have
benches in the courtyard, a development is expected this summer with accommodation students will be consulted about their wishes;
The right to the phones in the college this request is not in the sense of Ministerial Decisions
Focus on self 12.30 must maintain a proper meal time and deprive club.
Students need to be a priority in the library on Thursday between 15.30 and 16.30, this request is possible. Return
football; impossible before a reorganization of the court.
* Questions and answers parents
A flight bag has occurred in IDUs (lack of oversight?) Flights have places in different places despite the surveillance, talking to school life
In the absence of teachers is difficult to rearrange the timetable, except where the absence can be anticipated.
The portal remains open is a portal to access the private apartments, but a plan to close the facility is planned.
Membership in the household does not include the student's record but also other benefits see report CA. During construction of the self a part of the traps due to be removed. For parents
delegates Laurence Coia
REPORT OF BOARD OF CLASS II A. On November 23, 2009. Chaired by Mr. Georges Alban, Principal.
Teachers present:
Hist Geo, civics and Jur Soc Mr. Tessier. LV1 Lady Cotteaux
English.
English LV2 Mr. Duarte. Economic and social sciences
Madam GUITTON. Mr. BOUHRA
Mathematics.
Physics and Chemistry. Mr. Bordas.
Life sciences Earth Madam PASCAL. Phys Ed
and Sports Mrs. AUBOURG. French
Mr. BLANCHARD, Professor Principal.
counselors. Delegates
students Gwendoline HERIN Justine PINSON
Parents Delegate Jean-Louis Welsh.
Assessment of teacher:
In one or two exceptions, this class is smooth. She is average in both its level in his behavior and in its atmosphere. Despite his 34 students, it is fairly homogeneous. Reviews
different teachers on the Classroom:
Hist Geo, civics and Jur Soc. Mr. Tessier.
Class "nice" but with major differences between the extremes.
Mathematics. Mr. BOUHRA.
Lack of oral participation.
Physics and Chemistry. Mr. Bordas.
missing students methods of application. They do not seek information when they lack.
General note.
The results of this class are encouraging.
Delegate class: No comment.
Delegate Parent: No comment. Jean-Louis
Welsh. Delegate, and this writer of this report.
Report of the Board of Second Class D November 23, 2009 under the chairmanship of Mr. George (Headmaster)
Teachers present: Ms. Duval (Latin), Mrs BOUJU (English), Ms. REFOURD (English), Mr. BOUJU (Mathematics), Mr. FARIGOUX ( French), Mr. Guichard (History and Geography), Mr. LAWRENCE (Physics) and Mr. Saint-DERIVED (EPS)
Other persons present: Ms. Marchand (guidance counselor)
Deputies students: Julie and Julien Lafaye RICHARD
Deputies Parents: Sophie and Christine SIAB Tafforeau
Assessment of teacher: Good atmosphere but a work like "schoolboy" is still provided. Heterogeneity important. Mr.
BOUJU (Mathematics): Good but not much participation. Ms.
BOUJU (English): Great. Very good.
Ms. Duval (Latin): Group that works pretty well. A deepening in writing is desirable. Captain Joseph de Saint-DERIVED
(EPS): A lot of dynamism. Indoor activities are difficult to manage given the number of students (34) and lack of space. Fortunately the students are nice.
M. Guichard (History and Geography): Very attentive in class where they show a collective reflection. Very positive. Mr. LAWRENCE
(Physics): Students very willing, positive. An excellent start to the year. Ms.
REFOURD (English): Good. Mr.
FARIGOUX (French): Class pleasant, curious, involved well but still provides a work rather of "schoolboy" than "schoolboy". Notes
pupil delegates and answers: - They ask that checks are more spread over time. Answer: They have to do in part to their teachers because they can not know if students already have other duties imposed.
- The foyer can be opened for students during the Second Inter-course ? Answer: Mr. George will discuss this with school life. Notes
delegates from parents and answers: Is it possible to read the book in French is offered before the school holidays? Answer: The list is available on the website of the Lycée.
Minutes of the board of The First Class of 26 November 2009
chaired by Ms. BARAT (Senior Education Adviser)
Teachers present: Ms. BOUJU (English Reinforced), Ms. HOUSEHOLD (German LV1) , Mrs. Richard (English LV1), Mr. BLANCHARD (History-Geography-European Option), Mr. Duarte (English) Mr. BOUCHAUD (Mathematics), Mr. FARIGOUX (French), Mr. Barailler-PENOT (History and Geography), Mr. LAWRENCE (Physics) and M. Alinat (SVT), Mr. ST FROM (EPS)
Deputies students: Cora and Nora MILON Dupuis
Deputies parents: Christine Tafforeau
Assessment of teacher: A class that does not necessarily have the usual profile of First L. Ms. BARAT
Review: A class for which Ms. BARAT do not appreciate the behavior of some. Mr.
BOUCHAUD (Mathematics-Computer): Class very heterogeneous. A small group completely lacks maturity. Average low enough lack of work. Ms.
BOUJU (English reinforced): Disappointing. Students very unpleasant overall. An enormous effort must be made by 15 students in the group. Mrs. RICHARD
(LV1 and LV2 English): Class in general quite difficult at the beginning of the year because bad state of mind of a group. It's better but work is still uneven. 2 or 3 disruptive elements. Participation: it is always the same and that's unfortunate.
Mr. ST FROM (EPS): 6 students, others are with colleagues. Nothing special about the attitude. Efforts for some, less for others. Mr.
Barailler-PENOT (History and Geography): A class that has no literary highly visible profile. It arranges for some. Some students are lost and some make no effort, no discipline. Analysis remains superficial. Improves all the same work-related provided. Ms.
HOUSEHOLD (German LV1): Except for two students who work seriously, not satisfied. They are a little soft.
M. BLANCHARD (History-Geography-European Option) with Ms. COTEAUX: Good. Very motivated. Mr.
FARIGOUX (French): Results improved compared to earlier this year. Lack of personal work. Great difficulties in the literary commentary.
Mr. DUARTE (English LV2): Worried earlier this year because the work was inadequate. Better then. Participation: always the same. 4 students in big trouble. Mr.
Alinat (SVT) and Mr. LAWRENCE (Physics): Class heterogeneous. Class header too timid and too tail-class "dynamic" (rough) Many missing checks. Notes
pupil delegates and answers: A good classroom atmosphere. No tension between them but there are groups. Some disruptive elements. Difficulties in integrating some .. Notes
delegates Parents and answers: RAS
Proceedings of first class council STG / C Date: December 7 2009-12-08
Chairperson: Ms. BARAT (CPE)
Teachers attendance: Mrs BARBER (EPS), COUTURIER ( English), Guilbert-DERRIEN (Communication), Carrefour (English) Mrs.
RED (Eco-Law, Senior Lecturer), BLANCHARD (Hist-Geo), E. BLANCHARD (French)
Absent excused: Mr CHAHID (Math) Students
delegates: Layla RAULT and Rebecca RODRIGUES
Parent Student: Mr HEULIN
Class size: 16 Class Average: 11.23
Opinion teacher: Class pleasant enough, especially given its small size, could take advantage of ideal working conditions but where the atmosphere is not excellent due to lack of team spirit. The results are not bad but still a little weak for a first quarter. Some students are weak and / or provide insufficient work. Participation was an overall improvement. Opinion
PE teacher: In EPS, the two classes are grouped first STG and the number reached 28 students with whom it is quite difficult and tiring work because they do not listen few instructions. Most pupils demonstrated skills in action but the "launch" is often laborious.
Opinion of Professor of History Geography: Sharing the opinion of the teacher. Some boys provide a work surface and harmful behavior in the classroom. Opinion
French teacher: Class pleasant when it is difficult to get students' attention. No work atmosphere very average results. The class must get to work in the prospect of year-end review.
Opinion of Professor of Mathematics: The Results are means, most likely due to a lack of work. Opinion
English teacher: A group of boys spoil the atmosphere of the class
Opinion of Professor of Communication: The average is correct. Some disruptive elements who do not work enough.
Opinion of an English teacher: The class average was only 10.4 and a decline is to be feared in the second quarter. Some boys are no longer listening and some are being uncooperative. Four or five students participate well in oral.
During the examination of individual results, a student is assigned the congratulations of the class council, four encouragement and four warnings for unsatisfactory conduct and / or insufficient work.
Question of representing parents of students: The "spoilers" they adopt this behavior out of boredom or lack of interest in the subjects taught, which may be the consequence of a direction does not correspond to their wishes?
Response Speaker: No, all these students themselves have chosen this industry and some of them had such a behavior in second. Request
parent representative: Take effective measures to ensure that the "disruptive elements do not prevent other students work
Answer: the students involved will be formally cautioned.
0 comments:
Post a Comment